Evidence checked August 28, 2026. GoldRush’s Hyperliquid API overview documents managed Info and WebSocket access, including a livel4Bookstream with per-order snapshots and per-block diffs containing fields such asuser,oid, andcloid. The cited overview does not state Lighter coverage or a historical L4 window; compare its live L4 with 0xArchive’s Lighter L3 route. The 0xArchive route claims use Hyperliquid L4, Lighter L3, and Venue coverage.
What One Key Returns
Where GoldRush Fits
0xArchive reads market microstructure, while GoldRush’s Hyperliquid API overview documents managed Info and WebSocket access, including a livel4Book stream with per-order snapshots and per-block diffs containing fields such as user, oid, and cloid. The cited page does not state Lighter coverage or a historical L4 window. Choose GoldRush when managed Hyperliquid protocol access is the requirement; choose 0xArchive when the requirement is a bounded historical Hyperliquid or Lighter order-book route. If the job is protocol access rather than a market-data archive, 0xArchive is not the right fit for that layer.
The split is on-chain state versus market microstructure. Decoded transactions and account state do not substitute for a route that returns the resting book at a requested time, and a live L4 stream does not by itself establish historical L4 retention.